Outliners are great, but not optimal for tasks.Īt least that is my current insight. I lacked the feeling of having everything under control. The information was there - but I lacked a “mental picture” of it. Or to see them on a timeline / in a calendar.Īll in all, the task management in Logseq was actually quite a good experience and some points (linking with tags to different contexts) was even better than I could solve it so far.īut I still had a bad feeling that I had overlooked one of the hundreds of tasks - that I was not aware of how urgent it was or what I should really do next. For example, highlighting overdue tasks in colour. Overdue tasks can be identified via queries but I missed the visual aspect. In Logseq, it is so easy to assign tasks to different people or contexts using appropriate tags or page references and then to find them via the list of backlinks.īut the list of backlinks at the end of a page has always been a disorganised mess for me, which almost cancelled out the usefulness. Some of these points can perhaps be compensated for with new features in the future like: However, the more tasks I managed in Logseq, the more dissatisfied I became. It worked and some aspects of it even worked better than with other tools. I worked with Logseq in this way for many months and handled my entire task management through it. In addition, the queries were an important feature for bringing relevant tasks to the surface.Ī step backwards was (and still is) the search, which in my opinion urgently needs further improvement. I could manage the journal and my tasks in Logseq (instead of in Zettlr and Checkvist), had the possibilities of an outliner and with tags and backlinks I could relate everything nicely. So with Logseq I was able to replace 2 tools at once. I worked with the following tools before Logseq: Since I have appreciated organising information via outlines for many years, I was very interested when LOGseq made it possible to store information in local markdown files while continuing to use the beloved “outlining”. The task management system that works for me is decoupled from the tools I use.īefore Logseq, I worked with the online outliner “Checkvist” which offers excellent keyboard support and which I still like to use for complex checklists. Only when I have control over my tasks (and their time aspects), I can take care of the really important things in my job. Over the years, I have tried out and combined various methods to create a system that works for me. It is essential for my professional life to keep track of my own tasks and those of some of my colleagues - currently those are more than 350 tasks. I would like to start with a short info on my background and the topic of task management: But all in all, I was left with a bad feeling of not having a good overview of the tasks. I was able to implement my task management concept with Logseq and some aspects even worked better than in other tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |